I have a small blog as far as blogs go and I've never minded much. I created this space for me with hopes that some conversations - especially those about infertility - could reach a wider audience. But mostly I wanted a space where I could write, readers and editors be damned.
A few weeks ago, I got an email that made me wish it was otherwise. Made me long for an audience so big, so mighty that when I roared, people listened or when I asked Wil Wheaton to collate paper, he did.
The message came from a former colleague from my early newspapering days in North Carolina. Susan knew that I'd long since moved north, but she sent the letter to me and others with ties to North Carolina in hopes that we'd help her spread the word against a constitutional amendment on the state ballot May 8.
It's called Amendment 1 and it reads, in full:
"Constitutional amendment to provide that marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state."
As opponents note, the amendment is so broadly worded it won't just affect gay couples; it could also impact civil unions and domestic partnerships like the one Susan's 76-year-old mother and her partner, Pete, have shared for 20 years.
Of course, Susan wasn't writing me just to help couples like her mother and Pete. She wanted me to help her and Sera, her partner of four years.
"It might be helpful to know that nine years ago, I finally accepted that I am gay," she wrote. "I sincerely hope that you'll seriously think about how this Amendment will harm my family as well as tens of thousands of others in our state."
I finished the letter and felt not just enraged - by an amendment that codifies discrimination and prejudice and seeks to deny my friends the rights that I enjoy - but I also felt impotent. All of my friends that live in North Carolina are dedicated voters sure to vote against this amendment. Most of them likely have either given money to efforts to fight the amendment or are actively working to defeat it themselves. I can't really help, I thought.
It was one of the only times I can recall wishing for a bigger platform.
Almost immediately, I decided to write about it anyway because to not do so would be an affront to my friends in North Carolina and elsewhere who have to fight this type of discrimination day in, day out.
I mean, can you imagine having to write a letter to a former colleague to ask for help to defend your personal relationship? It's preposterous and yet, Susan had to. She has to fight to protect her right to make financial and medical decisions for her partner, if God forbid, Sera was ever incapacitated. She has to fight for their rights as a couple to even visit one another in the hospital.
"... at the end of the day, this is about my ability to hold Sera's hand as she draws her last breath," she wrote. "It's about Sera's ability to claim my remains after my death."
I emailed another friend back in North Carolina, a guy immersed in politics who works for the state, to ask how the hell this amendment even made it to the ballot. For perspective, when I covered the statehouse from 2000-2004, Democrats held the House and Senate in a vise grip, and Republicans were so far out of the power loop they were square.
That changed in 2010, when Republicans seized control of both chambers for the first time in more than 100 years.
"It came to pass because the R's have been pushing (it) for years and they finally took over and they have been pushing all this crazy social stuff," he said. It should be noted, however, that it didn't pass without support from Democrats too.
I went back and read a number of news stories to find out exactly why the Republicans lobbied for the amendment and it seems to boil down to this: they want the gay marriage ban codified in the constitution because they fear the possibility that even though state law already defines marriage as the legal union between a man and a woman, some judge somewhere could overturn that.
They also think gay marriage portends the collapse of all they hold sacred and good. To wit, here's what one Republican county commissioner said when asked why the state was focusing on social issues during tough economic times:
"One thing comes to mind. If the moral and social issues of our country are not addressed, we don't have to worry about the economic issues. They will not matter at that point in time."
The notion that gay couples threaten the institution of marriage or the fabric of our society seems ludicrous to me, not to mention bigoted. Maybe it's just indicative of my own ho-hum life, but my gay friends are fairly ordinary. No offense guys. They share photos of their vegetable gardens on Facebook, adore baseball parks like national treasures and take their children on annual vacations to Disney World. It's hard to take anyone seriously who thinks such couples undermine their own union or imperil mine.
Susan wrote a separate, but similar letter to someone else too -- a former county commissioner turned state senator whom she once covered as a beat reporter, a man she admired and respected. I've read the letter and it is vulnerable and deeply moving. In it, she tells her former source, a man in a position to vote on the amendment, that she has finally found a happiness she thought she'd never know now that she has embraced her true self.
"...for so long, I thought -- even feared -- that I would end up dying alone," she said. "I no longer have those worries, BUT I do fear the implications of writing discrimination into our state's founding document. Such a move not only devalues the life that my partner and I have worked hard to build together, it sends the message far and wide across this state that as an individual, I do not deserve the same respect that all other North Carolinians deserve."
He told her no can do and voted to put the amendment on the ballot.
Which is where you come in. Do you live in North Carolina or know someone who does? Did you vote early? Are you going to the polls May 8? Will you take someone who needs help getting there? Can you help Susan and Sera, Susan's mom and Pete and others like them?
Please help defeat this amendment.
(Susan and Sera)
One more thing, do yourself a favor and take a few minutes to read the letter Susan sent me. I linked to it above but I'll link to it again -- here. It speaks to the many consequences of this ballot initiative.